Cheat votes online through the use of exchanges in which money is paid for performing certain actions. The cheating of votes is very often ordered there. You can set a task to cheat votes, set a price and wait for people to do the work. The price, depending on the complexity, ranges from 1 to 50 rubles.
Cons:
- Human factor. Many people create multiple accounts, complete a task once, and get paid multiple times.
- You can not adjust the speed of execution, as it depends only on the desire of the people themselves.
- All transitions to your competition are easily tracked by site administrators, they will see that the transitions come from the job exchange.

Buying votes in contests through traffic surge. There are many resources that provide traffic surge services, that is, people go from any advertising banners on sites that mislead users. Have you seen square banners with half-naked girls or promises of quick money? A person goes with one goal, but ends up in your competition. Nevertheless, the cost of traffic per 1000 views is quite cheap, but the majority of votes will be cheated of low quality.
Cons:
- Transitions can be from all over the world, both from America and from Europe
- The person who clicked on your contest in 95% of cases will simply close the tab without voting
- Transitions are also tracked by contest administrators, they will see that people came from banners on incomprehensible sites.

Cheating votes through spam mailings. At the very beginning of the contests, almost all participants are engaged in spamming to cheat votes, however, the number of friends who would not block for this message ends and contestants begin to spam on various publics, acquaintances of acquaintances and even on completely unknown people, which of course leads to collapse. Cheating votes with the help of spammers even exists as a separate line of income.
Cons:
- Banned social accounts for complaints from social network users
- Complaints from the administration of the site on which the contests are held and the subsequent ban of the voting participant

Cheating votes using administrative resources. By this concept, we mean not only the drive of poor state employees to a computer class for manual vote-gathering, the same method is also used by business, and large families, as well as friendly neighbors. Everything is very simple here, people manually go to different browsers and vote for the desired participant.
Cons:
- Human factor. Slow speed, people get tired.
- Voting comes from the same addresses of computers, the Internet, which is quickly calculated by the resource administrator.
- Pay for people's work, regardless of the result.

Buy voting on the site through clickers. Many confident users and even system administrators in companies do not bother much about security when setting a task to win votes. They use elementary clickers that record the actions performed by the user and repeat the desired number of times. In conjunction with the TOR browser that changes IP addresses, you get a kind of program with which you can really get a lot of votes quickly and. However, it will still be the same computer from which the votes come, as well as the IP addresses of the TOR browser come from all over the world, which means that the voices will be from Europe, America, China and others.
Cons:
- IP addresses from all over the world, which will result in sanctions from the contest organizer
- There is no variety of platforms (mobile, PC, tablet), everything comes from only one or several computers
- Inability to change browser
- All transitions to the contest site come from the same encrypted link (TOR browser encrypts any information)